Senate Bill 1098 passed the Senate with one Republican vote from Senator Dick Anderson (R-Lincoln City) and is scheduled for a public hearing in the House Committee on Education. It will legalize pornography in school literature that is otherwise illegal. Democrat sponsors say that isn’t true since there is a process to justify removal or purchase that involves a committee.

Studies show that pornography is the most addictive substance, even worse than cocaine. That's because it is never satisfied, and always wants to go to the next level until it reaches rape and murder.

The younger the exposure, the higher the risk. Study shows 86% of boys and 51% of girls are exposed to porn before 18 and some at young as 8 years old. Viewing porn alters the development of dopamine centers shifting and changing their norms and standards. This affects their adult life, depriving them of intimacy, reducing their ability to be aroused by their spouse, robbing them of a satisfying marriage and family life. This bill plays political suicide with children lives. They want to blame guns for an increase in suicides in young people, but this exposes them to what has been proven to be improper and destructive life altering behavior. This will be another reason to homeschool and make public schools less desirable.

The State Library reports there were 20 challenges to literature across the state but many went unreported and solved internally. A clear pattern has emerged in recent OIFC reports: incidents and challenged materials are disproportionately about, by, or center around the stories of individuals who belong to an underrepresented protected class under ORS 659.850. In 2023-24, 87% of the items challenged told the stories of one or more underrepresented groups. 66% of challenged materials focused on 2SLGBTQIA+ people, while 22% were centered on Black, Indigenous, or people of color. This bill seems to be a challenge to our discrimination statues exposing vulnerabilities, and how it has conditioned us, forced us, to be tolerant of immorality.

ORS 336.455 curriculum requirements for human sexuality education must include promoting abstinence for school-age youth and mutually monogamous relationships with an uninfected partner for adults as the most effective way to prevent pregnancy and the transmission of STDs. However, abstinence may not be taught to the exclusion of other material and instruction on contraceptive and disease reduction measures.

It also requires a balanced, accurate information and skills-based learning on the risks and benefits of contraceptive and disease reduction measures. The mandates in ORS 336.035, 336.455 and 336.465, as well a ORS 581-022-2030 and 581-022-2050 authorizes the school district as the body to make choices of literature that are age-appropriate, based on best practices that are proven theory and practices.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Sex education courses must also include information on teen dating violence and “must be presented in a manner sensitive to the fact that there are students who have experienced sexual abuse” and must not devalue or ignore students who have engaged in sexual intercourse. Parents or guardians may remove their children from sex education via a opt-out policy.

SB 1098 applies to teachers with a classroom library, and purchase of textbooks and instructional material. It totally destroys all these safe guards crafted to protect students. Since a school library is defined as part of the educational infrastructure that supports learning, the bill conflicts with the statutes for sex education standards. To give students free reign of sexual materials in the library that does not comply with instructional standards and without parents’ knowledge or opt-out option is in violation and should not be permitted.

Placing temptations in school libraries that would be a crime if anyone on the street were to show these books to a child may lead to other crimes. It opens the door to more experimentation for students and headlines like "St. Helens High School teachers arrested on charges of sexual abuse of students".

Sponsors further don't want any challenges from voters to override their illegal, unethical, and immoral actions by adding an emergency clause to the bill. What constitutes an emergency in a bill that needs preplanning for school boards to enact policies, isn't justified. Testimony can be submitted until 3pm on May 2. Track on Oregon Citizens Lobby Alerts.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-29 17:59:14

Last Update: 2025-04-30 00:54:27

The Oregon Supreme Court issued an opinion on April 24, 2025 on State v. Lee, which reversed the Court of Appeals and the circuit court.

The case as described by Justia Daily: “An informant informed law enforcement that a person named "Tom Collins" was dealing heroin from a residence in Albany, Oregon. Detectives planned to use the informant in a controlled buy at the residence. Instead of waiting for the results of the controlled buy to apply for a warrant, the detectives applied for and obtained a search warrant that anticipated the controlled buy. The state argued that the warrant was an "anticipatory warrant" as approved by the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Grubbs. The defendant argued that such warrants are incompatible with Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.”

Article I, section 9 is the “Bill of Rights” and Section 9 is Unreasonable searches or seizures. No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search, or seizure; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath, or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.

“The Linn County Circuit Court denied the defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search, ruling that anticipatory warrants were valid under both the Oregon and U.S. Constitutions. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, concluding that anticipatory warrants were permissible under Article I, section 9, and that the affidavit established probable cause.

“The Oregon Supreme Court reviewed the case and declined to address the constitutional question. Instead, the court focused on Oregon's statutory warrant requirements, specifically ORS 133.555(2) and ORS 133.545(6). The court concluded that the affidavit in support of the warrant failed to comply with ORS 133.545(6), which requires that the facts and circumstances show that the objects of the search are in the places to be searched at the time of the warrant's issuance.”

ORS 133.545(6) The application shall consist of a proposed warrant in conformance with ORS 133.565 (Contents of search warrant), and shall be supported by one or more affidavits particularly setting forth the facts and circumstances tending to show that the objects of the search are in the places, or in the possession of the individuals, to be searched. If an affidavit is based in whole or in part on hearsay, the affiant shall set forth facts bearing on any unnamed informant’s reliability and shall disclose, as far as possible, the means by which the information was obtained.

“As a result, the warrant did not comply with ORS 133.555(2), and the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion to suppress.”

ORS 133.555(2) If the judge finds that the application meets the requirements of ORS 133.545 (Issuance of search warrant) and that, on the basis of the record made before the judge, there is probable cause to believe that the search will discover things specified in the application and subject to seizure under ORS 133.535 (Permissible objects of search and seizure), the judge shall issue a search warrant based on the finding of the judge and in accordance with the requirements of ORS 133.545 (Issuance of search warrant) to 133.615 (Return of the warrant). If the judge does not so find, the judge shall deny the application.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

This case exposes how the Oregon legislature has repeatedly passed laws that conflict with the constitutions. The Supreme Court continually refuses to deal with the conflict between the Oregon and U.S. Constitutions verses Oregon statutes by repeatedly overturning the lower courts. Recently they overturned the decision against Measure 114 restricting the right to bear arms for defense.

The legislature could have corrected the conflict in this case when amending HB 2473, but instead they eliminated added warrant authorizations and switched it to repealing the manner of committing the crime of harassment, and requiring a phlebotomist to withdraw blood for evidence of driving under the influence.

Perhaps the Supreme Court doesn’t want to expose multiple legislative conflicts because they hold their purse strings. Justice Flynn has submitted SB 96 giving the Supreme Court judges a $100,000 raise and equivalent raises for lower courts with a $33.3 Million impact on the General Fund. It is currently being reviewed by Ways and Means.

The fact that the Supreme Court didn’t include the constitution in their decision, which takes priority, should be disturbing to all Oregonians. Now there is a known heroin dealer back in action.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-26 12:08:29

Last Update: 2025-04-25 18:22:52

Governor Tina Kotek announced a $10 million investment in artificial intelligence (AI) workforce development alongside a new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the State of Oregon and NVIDIA to expand AI education and skill-building.

“AI is transforming the way we live and work, and Oregon should not be left behind,” Governor Kotek said. “This collaboration with NVIDIA helps us meet the moment. Oregon will not only prepare our workers, businesses, and public service professionals for a prosperous future, we will lead the way.”

“AI has ushered in a new industrial revolution, and governments, educators and partners are racing to shape a world where everyone can thrive through technology and AI training,” said Louis Stewart, Head of Strategic Initiatives at NVIDIA. “Through this new collaboration, Oregon will have access to the NVIDIA technologies it needs to upskill and empower its workforce to innovate, compete and grow its economy.”

The MOU establishes a collaborative framework for Oregon and NVIDIA to foster entrepreneurship, expand AI-focused education and skill-building to prepare Oregonians for the future, and help state agencies identify ways to responsibly use AI to improve government services.

The initiative is to collaborate with Oregon’s higher education institutions to develop a comprehensive AI training programs to equip students with practical skills in AI, machine learning, and data science; and facilitate hands-on learning experiences about NVIDIA’s cutting-edge technologies. The MOU mentions AI frameworks and simulation tools, with a specific focus on applications in semiconductor design, microelectronics, and renewable energy solutions, which will be new for NVIDIA. Their expertise has been in gaming and graphics.

Included in the objectives, there is mention of:

• Advance Oregon’s economic competitiveness and global leadership in industries like renewable energy, smart cities, and precision agriculture.
• Focus on addressing challenges in climate resilience, healthcare analytics, renewable energy optimization, and smart city infrastructure while ensuring Oregon remains a leader in AI innovation.
• Ensure these programs center the needs of and prioritize accessibility for underserved and rural communities to create equitable workforce development opportunities.
• Engage a diverse set of stakeholders—including academic institutions, businesses, startups, and community organizations—to ensure equitable access to AI education, resources, and technologies.

As part of the collaboration, NVIDIA will work with the Higher Education Coordinating Commission (HECC) and Oregon’s colleges and universities to launch an AI Ambassador Program, which will place trained ambassadors across Oregon campuses to provide hands-on training and mentorship to students. The work will be overseen by a steering committee composed of state and industry representatives.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“We are excited for this strategic collaboration with NVIDIA that will help position Oregon higher education institutions and workforce training providers to lead in preparing students for responsible application of AI and cutting-edge technologies needed in Oregon,” HECC Director Ben Cannon said. “This highly collaborative and tailored approach to training, innovation and research for some of the most high-demand fields in Oregon is designed to drive economic growth and open doors for diverse Oregonians to high-paying careers.”

A metrics for workforce development is keyed on the percentage increase in participation from underrepresented groups, including rural and economically disadvantaged populations. Outcome measurements include enrollment rates in these programs, with data on participation from underrepresented groups, the number of scholarships or financial aid opportunities provided to economically disadvantaged students pursuing AI-related programs, and the increase in participation rates of individuals from underrepresented groups in Oregon’s AI education and workforce initiatives.

Alongside the MOU, the Governor is directing $10 million in available Oregon CHIPS Act funding to Oregon’s Semiconductor Talent Sustaining Fund, established in 2023 in Senate Bill 4. SB 4 limits the Governor’s discretion to $50,000 for a single grant with preferences given to businesses owned by members of underrepresented communities and economically disadvantaged individuals.

Oregon House passed the $210 million Oregon CHIPS Act, which includes $190 million in direct grants and loans for semiconductor companies seeking federal funding to expand in Oregon, as well as $10 million for research at universities and $10 million to help with land development costs. Furthermore, the U.S. Commerce Department is releasing federal CHIPS Act funding in stages, and Oregon is expected to receive more of the billions in yet-to-be-distributed funds, if they clean up their act.

The MOU obligates Oregon to provide sustained investment in modernizing research facilities, encourage expansion, and fostering AI innovation hubs to ensure Oregon institutions remain globally competitive. "The investment will support workforce development projects tied to semiconductor and AI sectors, with a focus on training Oregonians – especially those from underrepresented communities – for high paying careers."

Instead of revising policies that don't meet new standards, it seems like Governor Kotek is playing double-dare with the Trump Administration at every turn. Oregonians are disenfranchised over socialist policies that discriminate picking winners and losers. Let Governor Kotek know how you feel.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-25 15:47:37

Last Update: 2025-04-25 17:58:15

Beaverton parent, Jeff Myers of Save Oregon Schools has filed a lawsuit against the Beaverton School District over student privacy, parental rights, and a public school system that is increasingly operating without transparency or consent.

In January 2025, Beaverton School District quietly launched a new digital hall pass system (DHP) at eight of its middle schools. Students are now required to submit digital requests before leaving class for basic needs like using the restroom, going to the nurse, or accessing their locker. Teachers must approve the request, and the system logs the destination, time, and duration of each pass. These records are stored indefinitely in the district's Synergy Student Information System (SIS).

Myers says, “The DHP system is being actively used for behavioral monitoring and intervention. Staff teams regularly analyze student hall pass data to identify "top users" – students who leave class more frequently than average. These students may be flagged and referred to counselors or behavior specialists, often before parents are notified or involved.” Myers became concerned after his daughter displayed anxiety over this system being installed at her school, and decided to file a lawsuit.

The lawsuit asks the court to:

• Immediately suspend the use of the digital hall pass system district-wide;
• Prevent further collection and analysis of DHP data;
• Require the district to submit an inventory of the data collected through the system;
• Permanently purge all previously collected data;
• Affirm the rights of parents to be notified and provide meaningful consent before schools launch systems that collect and/or act on sensitive behavioral data.

Myers’ lawsuit argues that the district's actions violate both federal and Oregon law. Key claims include:

• The Fourteenth Amendment: Parents have a constitutional right to direct the upbringing and medical decisions of their children.
• ORS 336.184 & ORS 336.187: These laws require schools to notify parents and provide opt-out rights for behavioral or health-related screenings.
• ORS 326.565: Governs student educational records and restricts access to those with a legitimate educational interest.

The district has tried to justify the system under the doctrine of in loco parentis, but the lawsuit claims public schools are government actors and cannot override parental rights without due process.

Myers says: “The district has positioned this system as a solution to behavioral challenges in middle schools. But what they’re not saying is that these challenges were in large part created by their own policies. Over a decade ago, Beaverton phased out traditional disciplinary frameworks in favor of restorative justice, which has often led to inconsistent enforcement and a breakdown in accountability. Rather than confront this reality and reevaluate their discipline model, the district has doubled down—choosing to surveil every student instead.

“These systems are being marketed as modern tools for classroom management. But in practice, they function as behavioral surveillance networks that track kids in ways most parents are never told about.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

The lawsuit states: "This is not a digitized bathroom pass. It’s a behavioral surveillance platform that profiles students without their knowledge, and certainly without ours as parents."

This is not just a Beaverton issue. The DHP system impacts more than 6,400 students and was implemented without any meaningful explanation, opt-out process, or oversight. It’s becoming a nationwide trend to market the system as a tool to control every child, and not provide help to the few who misbehave. “That’s not innovation—it’s institutional overreach,” Myers says. “If your district isn’t using something like this yet, it might be next.”

Myers offers suggestion to parents wanting to question their child's school or school board.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-25 14:51:09

Last Update: 2025-04-25 17:57:27

The Oregon Senate Democrat Majority are claiming a victory in a 28 to 1 bipartisan vote on Senate Bill 1191. “Oregonians can inform others of their constitutional and civil rights without being guilty of interfering with law enforcement.” The bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator James Manning Jr.(D-Eugene/Springfield) and Senator Sara Gelser Blouin (D-Albany)

Democrats released this statement: “Rights granted in the United States Constitution and the Oregon Constitution include freedoms of speech and association along with rights to due process and to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.” If the constitution already contains these rights, then what is the necessity of this bill? Could it be that the courts have gone rogue? And what about Second Amendment protections against “unreasonable searches and seizures” absent in SB 243, SB 3075 and SB 3076?

Under Senate Bill 1191, telling people about these rights does not qualify as the crimes of obstructing government and judicial processes or preventing law enforcement from performing their duties. However, the bill lacks where to draw the line of when vocal instruction becomes an obstruction. Does screaming in the face of an officer the advice to a detainee cross the line?

The Senate, according to the Democrats, acted on the bill knowing the federal administration has boasted about deploying law enforcement to punish political opposition. This presumption is mal-information, a false statement to bolster their position. The federal administration has repeatedly stated, they will only seek out criminal activity. To interpret that as punishing political opposition” is false.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“If you see someone being questioned, it’s okay to say, ‘Hey you have the right to an attorney,’” said Senator James I. Manning, Jr (D – Eugene, Elmira & Veneta), chief sponsor of the measure. “It’s not against the law as long as no one physically intervenes. Free speech is what this is about, and we need to defend it against growing threats.”

We’ve all heard of “ambulance chasers”. Those people have a legitimate license. This bill opens the door for illegitimate chasers, no license required. In Oregon, it isn’t just interfering with judicial administration, it’s the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) can also include impersonating a lawyer providing advice, even if the person is not charging for their services. Federal law forbids unauthorized immigration consultants or "notarios" who provide immigration advice on specific situations can be prosecuted under federal law.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-20 19:48:19

Last Update: 2025-04-20 20:58:30

On Tuesday, House Republicans forced a vote on the House Floor for legislation that would lower taxes for the most tax-burdened Oregonians, including middle class income tax cuts and ‘No Tax on Tips.’ Republicans also forced a vote on the repeal of Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, also known as the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT).

“Today we pursued tax relief that empowers families to keep more of what they earn,” said House Republican Leader Christine Drazan (R-Canby). “Despite these missed opportunities, House Republicans remain committed to making Oregon more affordable and will continue to use every tool to lower the cost of living and improve the quality of life in our beautiful state.”

From the time the Democrat House Caucus announced their priorities. The Republican Caucus has tried to help them meet their goals to increase prosperity, make Oregon more affordable, make Oregon safer and healthier, and protect rights and freedoms. House Majority Leader Ben Bowman (D-Tigard, Metzger, & S. Beaverton) said, “The legislature’s job is to improve Oregonians’ lives...and the values-driven leaders in our caucus will work hard to deliver results for working people." The Republican House gave Democrats an opportunity to advance their priorities.

Legislation to cut taxes and address the cost of living for working Oregonians include:

• HB 3753 – Income Tax Cut
• HB 3914 – No Tax on Tips
• HB 2033 – Repeal Oregon’s Hidden Sales Tax (CAT)

House Democratic Leadership strategically permitted some Democratic members to vote for the motions, while blocking a path to a majority vote using what has been dubbed a “hall pass.” The motion on all three measures ultimately failed.

“Today, on Tax Day, this body missed an opportunity to help the working poor in our state by making Oregon more affordable. Passing this bill would lower income taxes for hard-working Oregonians who earn lower wages,” said Rep. E. Werner Reschke (R-Klamath Falls), chief sponsor of HB 3753 and Vice Chair of the House Revenue Committee. “It seems like just what the doctor ordered in a world still riddled with inflated costs.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“By eliminating taxes on tips today, we could have sent the message to Oregonians that we entrust them with more economic freedom. But instead, this body decided to tell them that once again, we think the government knows best,” said Rep. Lucetta Elmer (R-McMinnville), chief sponsor of HB 3914 and Deputy House Republican Leader. “I fundamentally disagree with this notion.”

“We can’t tax our businesses into prosperity,” said Rep. Boomer Wright (R-Reedsport) chief sponsor of HB 2033. “Repealing the CAT Tax would eliminate Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, which would incentivize job growth and get rising costs under control. Oregonians have been taxed enough and today we missed a huge opportunity to ease the tax burden. It’s time to neuter the CAT.”

On April 1st, House Republicans hand-delivered a letter to House Speaker Julie Fahey requesting fair hearings, work sessions, and a Floor vote on priority cost-of-living legislation that would provide desperate relief for Oregonians. As of April 15th, House Republicans have not received a response.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-20 12:44:45

Last Update: 2025-04-20 20:19:14

On Tuesday, House Republicans forced a vote on the House Floor for legislation that would lower taxes for the most tax-burdened Oregonians, including middle class income tax cuts and ‘No Tax on Tips.’ Republicans also forced a vote on the repeal of Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, also known as the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT).

“Today we pursued tax relief that empowers families to keep more of what they earn,” said House Republican Leader Christine Drazan (R-Canby). “Despite these missed opportunities, House Republicans remain committed to making Oregon more affordable and will continue to use every tool to lower the cost of living and improve the quality of life in our beautiful state.”

From the time the Democrat House Caucus announced their priorities. The Republican Caucus has tried to help them meet their goals to increase prosperity, make Oregon more affordable, make Oregon safer and healthier, and protect rights and freedoms. House Majority Leader Ben Bowman (D-Tigard, Metzger, & S. Beaverton) said, “The legislature’s job is to improve Oregonians’ lives...and the values-driven leaders in our caucus will work hard to deliver results for working people." The Republican House gave Democrats an opportunity to advance their priorities, but uniting on the same goal seems to be out of the question.

Legislation to cut taxes and address the cost of living for working Oregonians presented on the House Floor:

• HB 3753 – Income Tax Cut
• HB 3914 – No Tax on Tips
• HB 2033 – Repeal Oregon’s Hidden Sales Tax (CAT)

House Democratic Leadership strategically permitted some Democratic members to vote for the motions, while blocking a path to a majority vote using what has been dubbed a “hall pass.” The motion on all three measures ultimately failed.

“Today, on Tax Day, this body missed an opportunity to help the working poor in our state by making Oregon more affordable. Passing this bill would lower income taxes for hard-working Oregonians who earn lower wages,” said Rep. E. Werner Reschke (R-Klamath Falls), chief sponsor of HB 3753 and Vice Chair of the House Revenue Committee. “It seems like just what the doctor ordered in a world still riddled with inflated costs.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“By eliminating taxes on tips today, we could have sent the message to Oregonians that we entrust them with more economic freedom. But instead, this body decided to tell them that once again, we think the government knows best,” said Rep. Lucetta Elmer (R-McMinnville), chief sponsor of HB 3914 and Deputy House Republican Leader. “I fundamentally disagree with this notion.”

“We can’t tax our businesses into prosperity,” said Rep. Boomer Wright (R-Reedsport) chief sponsor of HB 2033. “Repealing the CAT Tax would eliminate Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, which would incentivize job growth and get rising costs under control. Oregonians have been taxed enough and today we missed a huge opportunity to ease the tax burden. It’s time to neuter the CAT.”

On April 1st, House Republicans hand-delivered a letter to House Speaker Julie Fahey requesting fair hearings, work sessions, and a Floor vote on priority cost-of-living legislation that would provide desperate relief for Oregonians. As of April 15th, House Republicans have not received a response.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-17 11:44:45

Last Update: 2025-04-17 00:13:09

Governor Tina Kotek convened Oregon businesses to discuss the potential impacts of President Trump’s U.S. tariffs on all countries and territories that went into effect earlier this month, as well as a series of other tariffs his administration has threatened to enact. Following the meeting, Governor Kotek and Business Oregon launched a survey to hear directly from Oregon businesses.

Governor Kotek stated: “Oregon has one of the most trade-dependent economies in the nation. What business owners need right now is stability and predictability. President Trump’s 10% minimum tariff was one of the most drastic trade decisions since 1930. Had these tariffs been in place on Oregon's $28.2 billion in imported goods last year, companies in Oregon would have had an additional $7.4 billion tax bill to pay." She must mean $2.8 billion, but the idea is to buy American that will expand the U.S. economy, which will result in a return back to Oregonians in increased jobs and wages.

Kotek continues, “Though little will be known about the impacts of the tariffs for several months, I want to raise awareness about the effect on Oregon businesses because business owners and families who are already struggling to make ends meet are forced to live with uncertainty while the price of everyday goods like groceries keep climbing.

“That’s why I brought together Oregon businesses from across sectors, the State Treasurer, the State Economist, and Business Oregon to discuss everything we know today, understand what the top concerns are, and how the state can be an ally in this fight. And I am eager to hear from more businesses, which is why Business Oregon is launching a survey. To our businesses –your success is Oregon’s success, and we are in this together.”

If it's stability that's desired, Kotek should listen to the reasons businesses would leave the state. A University of Oregon Institute for Policy Research and Engagement School of Planning, Public Policy, and Management, says in a report that thousands of potential jobs and billions of potential private investments have been lost to Oregon in the past five years and the state will lose even more in the next five years. A number of businesses indicated they were choosing to relocate because of tax and regulatory burdens, problems associated with attracting and retaining talent, combined with an unfavorable business climate. The report indicates Oregon businesses are being actively recruited because of the poor business environment. Tariffs will settle at a more advantageous level, but tariffs won't cause businesses to relocate out-ot-state.

U.S. tariffs are taxes paid by companies in the U.S. when they purchase tariffed goods coming from outside the country. The new tariffs in place today, including a 145% tariff on goods from China and 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, along with 10% for all other countries and territories, amount to the combined equivalent of a 26% sales tax on imported goods coming into Oregon. This new tax significantly increases the cost of inputs for Oregon manufacturers and can ultimately significantly increase costs for Oregonians.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

In response, the Governor convened the following Oregon business executives:

• Trey Winthrop, CEO, Bob's Red Mill
• Todd Nelson, Co-owner, Bountiful Farms Nursery
• Steve Gibbs, VP of Government Affairs, Columbia Distributing
• Paul Durant, Owner and General Manager, Durant Vineyards & Olive Oil Mill
• Dave Dillon, President, Food Northwest
• Jeff Stone, Executive Director/CEO, Oregon Association of Nurseries
• Nick Edwards, Vice President, Oregon International Port of Coos Bay Commission
• Curtis Robinhold, Executive Director, Port of Portland
• Emma Mcilroy, CEO, Wildfang
• Lisa Charpilloz Hanson, Director, Oregon Department of Agriculture

Oregon State Treasurer Elizabeth Steiner said, “The administration’s tariffs are an unwanted and unnecessary tax that many Oregonians can’t afford. Too many Oregonians are reeling from seeing their college, retirement, and home buying savings eroded by this avoidable turmoil in the market. Too many businesses are seeing their supply chains disrupted, their plans frozen, and their bottom lines battered by tariffs no one outside the administration asked for. I urge the Trump Administration to change coursbute and end these reckless trade wars once and for all.”

In addition to the Governor’s roundtable discussion, Business Oregon is launching a brief survey to hear directly from Oregon companies regarding tariffs and global trade. Small- and medium-sized businesses currently engaged in global trade are encouraged to participate.

Overall, while some businesses might be faced with economic headwinds due to the tariffs, the majority has the potential to benefit from increased domestic manufacturing and potential employment, return of 'made in Oregon' pride, and overall economic growth.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-16 17:09:22

Last Update: 2025-04-16 19:06:24

The imbalance of the Oregon legislature is very clear in the lack of separation of powers among the executive branch. This problem is never more clear when there is a conflict of interest involved.

This imbalance is the Problem in Senate Bill 96, which proposes a significant salary increase for judges, with the Oregon Supreme Court Chief Justice Meagan A. Flynn as the chief sponsor. This bill lacks legislative sponsorship and seeks to raise judges' salaries by over $100,000 per year immediately upon passage via the Emergency Clause. The fiscal impact is estimated to be $33.3 million General Fund in the 2025-27 and 2027-29 biennium for the Oregon Judicial Department (OJD). These funds would come from the Oregon General Fund, to which all taxpayers contribute. SB 96 has passed out of the Senate committee and is currently in the Ways and Means Committee.

This is just one of many bills drafted and submitted without legislative branch involvement. Two hundred-sixty-six legislative bills have been introduced in the current legislative session that doesn't have a legislator as sponsor.

The Solution is Senate Bill 1006. According to the Constitution, the Legislative branch is responsible for creating bills and overseeing the state budget, including the general fund. Since 1953, Oregon has allowed the Executive and Judiciary branches to draft and make laws.

Senator Kim Thatcher introduced SB 1006 to restore the proper balance of the three branches of government and ensure that only the Legislative branch can draft and introduce bills. This bill has garnered bipartisan support and aims to align Oregon with the best practices of 40 other states that prohibit non-legislative entities from drafting and introducing bills.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Quote from Senator Thatcher “The Oregon Constitution is clear: the Legislature is the only branch of government responsible for making laws. The executive and judicial branches play critical roles in enforcing and interpreting laws but writing them is not their job. Yet, for too long, they have been enabled to bypass the system, introducing legislation without any direct accountability to the people. This practice undermines the role of the Legislature and, ultimately, the voice of the people. SB 1006 is about restoring the proper balance of power and ensuring that Oregonians’ elected lawmakers determine the laws that govern our state.”

SB 1006 received a public hearing in March. The next step is to email your legislators, particularly those on the Senate Rules Committee, to request a work session for SB 1006 and move the bill forward for a floor vote. This action would demonstrate citizens' involvement and concern for their government and governance.

SB 1006 can be tracked with email options at Oregon Citizens Lobby Alerts.


--Silver Eagle

Post Date: 2025-04-16 11:04:35

Last Update: 2025-04-16 14:55:06

When enforcement fails, legislators always look for more money to solve problems. Oregon Humane Society (OHS) is behind Senate Bill 1076, sponsored by Senator Floyd Prozanski (D-Springfield/Eugene). SB 1076 is hoping to find new money from a new licensing program for animal rescue and breeders.

Oregon has been active in passing animal protection laws within the state. In 2023, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed two bills into law that aim to protect the well-being of animals in the state, and those brought into the state. In addition to animal protection, it made animal cruelty a felony. But, in doing so, they have made Oregon a destination state for mistreated animals.

The Animal Rescue Entity oversight began in 2013 under city and county authority, designed to solve the spreading of diseases, but lacked funding. In 2019 enforcement was transferred to Oregon Department of Agriculture with enough funding to make the program self-funded, but licensing fees were insufficient. A raise in fees was not well received in 2024, so the proposal in SB 1076 is to duplicate breeding practices and animal cruelty statutes ORS 167.374 and ORS 609.420 with a new licensing program on top of other licensing requirements, which adds more administrative expenses than projected to bring in.

Denese Oster testified, “Rescue groups obtain a license with the state already, and breeders license their animals with the counties and cities, and if they are large enough, they obtain a kennel license with that same county or city.” This isn’t about protecting animals; it’s about collecting more money.

OHS historically has imported 60%, the highest number of dogs into Oregon annually, and under this bill would receive an even-greater share of the dogs. Once OHS confiscates animals, under an Oregon Supreme Court ruling, they own them and do whatever they choose with them, and have been known to sell them before a court determines guilt or innocence.

Gny Sgt Rodney Hames testified of the fear that this bill will result in more raid. “The OHS takes in donations, sells the animals they seize and have police powers to help them get those animals. Please remember, the OHS is so poor with their police procedures/due process, a court threw out a few years’ worth of convictions. This bill would also allow the agency staff and the OHS unfettered access to the homes and property of individuals. … The Oregon Humane Society has helped to import and dump onto Oregonians, some of the worst and problematic animals in the country, partly because “we must save all the animals”…. They don’t perform health testing on animals prior to finding homes…They are part of a larger network of groups across the country who transport animals from areas who have failed to control their own pet populations.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Several testified how SB 1076 will severely disrupt youth agricultural programs like 4-H and FFA, which depend on responsible breeders for animals used in educational projects. These programs teach invaluable life skills and provide important services to communities. The legislative fiscal office has identified the Oregon Youth Authority with the greatest impact. It will also disrupt Oregon’s pet-related events that generate more than $8.3 million annually for the state’s economy, harming tourism and negatively affect local businesses, potentially causing millions of dollars in losses.

Alexis Jacobson works with livestock breeders testified, “Youth members of these organizations rely on heritage breeders for their project animals, where they will learn responsibility, money management, marketing, career readiness, and much more. While some of these project animals may be sold at their local county fair at the end of the day, some return to their home or farm to become breeding projects for the youth member’s own herd/flock or their family’s herd/flock. If a youth livestock breeder must pay a fee to have a license for their project, that means that much less money is generated from their project. Often, the funds raised from their projects help pay for these members’ college tuition, their first car, their first business, and much more.”

SB 1076 will most likely create an ongoing expense to the state as there are not enough breeders or rescue shops to sustain a program without taxpayer general fund appropriations. Why should taxpayer support a program that is already well regulated and licensed, which could be solved without additional expense just by making the practice of importing unregulated dogs for fee-based adoptions illegal.

Track this bill on Oregon Citizens Lobby Alerts.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-15 23:01:21

Last Update: 2025-04-15 23:34:48

Oregon's gun regulations have evolved significantly in the last two decades. However, the step-by-step changes have accelerated this session. Democrat leadership has doubled-down introducing seven bills and has accumulated their priorities in a gut-n-stuff amendment to Senate Bill 243 with -4 Amendments. It has passed out of the Senate Committee on Judiciary, chaired by Senator Floyd Prozanski (D-Springfield/Eugene) regardless of the 60% in opposition.

SB 243 as Amended lists gunowner restrictions:

• Dealer purchase waiting period extended to 72 hours after the dealer receives approval number.
• Prohibits anyone to possess, purchase, receive, transport, manufacture, sell, offer to sell, or transfer a rapid fire activator.
• Creates a Class B felony crime of unlawful transport, manufacture or transfer of a rapid fire activator, and Creates a Class A misdemeanor crime of unlawful possession of a rapid fire activator if a person knowingly possesses, purchases, or receives a rapid fire activator. Exemption if registered with federal machine gun law.
• Expands public area restrictions for conceal carry to include grounds adjacent to restricted buildings such as a city, county, metropolitan service district, or port operating a commercial airport, hospitals, schools, residence of any state official, and anywhere a sign is posted, except if there is an adopted policy for concealed carry and post on their website.

House Bill 3075 and HB 3076 also passed out of committee. HB 3075 makes it harder to lawfully obtain a firearm by increasing the firearm permit provisions in Ballot Measure 114, including adding additional eligibility requirements, fees, and doubling the wait time to issue permits to 60 days. HB 3076 directs the Department of Justice to create a state licensure program, adding additional, unnecessary oversight to an industry that already follows extensive federal regulations, including background checks, ATF licensing, and strict compliance laws.

“These bills are an absurd attempt to target law-abiding Oregon gunowners,” said Rep. Alek Skarlatos (R-Winston). “They will ban standard size magazines, impose fees on the exercise of a constitutional right, and place prohibitive regulations on every local gunsmith and gun store, forcing these small businesses to close.”

A citizens initiative in 2000 opened the door for legislators with a passion against firearms to begin chopping away at Second Amendment Rights. Each success brought a new boldness with a new level of restrictions. There is one common sponsor on every bill with individual sponsorship, and that is Senator Floyd Prozanski (D-Springfield/Eugene). A close second is Representative Lew Frederick (D-N Portland) and Representative Kathleen Taylor (D-Milwaukie).

In 2000, Measure 5, called Oregon Background Checks for Transfer of Firearms, required background checks be completed before a gun dealers or gun show dealers hand over the gun to private parties.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

In 2015, Senate Bill 941, Oregon Firearms Safety Act, adds the requirement for private or unlicensed firearms sellers conduct background checks. It pass with over 1,000 submitting testimony. Also passed was Senate Bill 525, which prohibits convicted domestic violence offenders and people subject to domestic abuse restraining orders from possessing guns and ammunition. Passing with about 1200 submitted testimonies.

In 2016, Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order No 16-12, which reinstated the policy for Oregon State Police to retain gun registration data for five years after it was suspending in 2010 due to a raid on David Pyles for multiple purchases. It also directed OHA to study the effects of gun violence and suicide, and propose policies related to gun violence and its effect on public health. This order has had the affect of shifting the blame for deaths on the gun and not the status of the individual misusing the gun.

In 2017, Senate Bill 719 created the Extreme Risk Protection Order Law prohibiting a person from possessing a deadly weapon when the court finds that person presents risk in near future, including imminent risk of suicide or causing injury to another person. Sponsored by Governor Kate Brown.

In 2018, House Bill 4145, called Gun Violence Protection People, allows a court order to prohibit possession of a firearm for a misdemeanor conviction. It deals with stalking and domestic violence convictions banned from owning firearms. Submitted testimony was over 2,000

In 2021, Senate Republicans tried eight maneuvers on the floor to derail Senate Bill 554. but passed with the help of three Republicans Senators giving the Democrats quorum to pass the bill. Required gun owners to secure their guns in locked storage when it is not under their control, restricted guns in the Capitol and allowed school districts, community colleges, and universities to ban guns on their premises. Submitted testimony was 1,179 in opposition to 201.

In 2022, voters passed Measure 114, also known as the Reduction of Gun Violence Act. It aims to change gun laws in the state by requiring a permit to purchase or acquire a firearm and banning the sale, transfer, and importation of magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition. It created a permit-to-purchase system in Oregon, required background check be completed before transfer of firearms, and limited the sale or transfer of magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. The Appeals Court lifted the hold on the implementation of Measure 114, and is now headed to the appellate court for review of the decision.

In 2023, House Bill 2005 dealt with 'ghost guns'. Submitted testimony was 702 in opposition to 216 bearing out the uncertainty. The bill prohibits individuals from owning firearms with no metal parts and as well as firearms or firearm parts that do not have a serial number. Gives owner one year to get firearms and firearm parts serialized.

Gun owners have expressed that gun restrictions on their Second Amendment rights is declaring them guilty without the right to prove their Second Amendment rights, and without any criminal act or intent. One gunowner expressed, "They want to disarm us while at the same time they want to let more criminals go free (HB 2640) and extend sanctuary to sex offenders (SB 820 and SB 821)."

Follow and take action on these and other gun bills on Oregon Citizens Lobby Alerts.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-10 19:28:06

Last Update: 2025-04-11 16:39:30

The Trump Administration sent Oregon Department of Education a Requested Certification of compliance with Title VI and the Supreme Court decision in SFFA v. Harvard.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

This assurance is given “in consideration of” federal aid, and the federal government extends assistance “in reliance on” the assurance of compliance. See 3 R. Cappalli, Federal Grants § 19:20, at 57, and n. 12 (1982) (written assurances are merely a formality because the statutory mandate applies and is enforceable apart from the text of any agreement).

Dr. Charlene Williams, Director of the Oregon Department of Education responded, without signing the Requested Certification, by letter certifying compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when the grants were issued.

Threats to this federal funding without lawful authority or established requirements put key programs at risk that students and schools across Oregon depend on every day. There is no circumstance where it is okay to leverage children’s resources as a political tool. Oregonians paid for and deserve these federal investments. We are standing up for the rights of all Oregonians and will continue to promote diversity in our schools because we recognize it enhances learning outcomes for all students.

Williams maintains since programs were certified compliant when accepted under the prior administration and because the Request for Certification hasn’t gone through rulemaking processes, it has no authority, and she isn’t signing it.

Governor Tina Kotek issued a statement in response: “Since the start of the new federal administration, I promised Oregonians that I would not back down from a fight when it comes to safeguarding Oregon values. Making sure every child has the opportunity to meet their future promise with a strong public education is one of the most fundamental responsibilities of government and one of my top priorities as Governor.

“The Trump Administration’s threat to shortchange Oregon students hurts children and families and undermines the dedication and work of our educators. That is why I directed ODE to hold the line today. We will not tolerate this unwarranted and unlawful attempt to take away resources promised to Oregon students and paid for by the tax dollars we send to the federal government.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Governor Kotek seems to forget that as Superintendent of Public Instruction, she is responsible for Oregon's fourth-grade students ranking third worst nationally in math and are tied for the fourth-worst score in reading. A study from Harvard and Stanford professors found that Oregon was the only state out of 30 studied where elementary and middle school students continued to lose ground in math and reading from 2022 to 2023. Oregon students are now three-quarters of a year behind in math and two-thirds of a year behind in reading.

Also at risk is the Title IX investigation in Portland schools for subjecting females to discrimination and indignity in their activities, denying them of their civil rights. Kotek continues to allow males to compete in female sports and use female facilities.

Senator Noah Robinson (R-Cave Junction) expressed on the Senate floor that “the Committee on Education explained the complexity of the education system requires the help of attorneys to keep schools in compliance with the myriad of laws pertaining to their funding and operation.” Still the legislature's leadership continues to push DEI bills through the legislature.

What Kotek promised Oregonians, just may not be what they want.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-10 16:34:07

Last Update: 2025-04-10 17:48:04