The Oregon Elections Division's recent decision against Senator David Brock Smith reveals a systematic pattern of political coercion that extends far beyond simple campaign finance violations. The investigation, which found Smith failed to report $4,968 in radio airtime contributions, has helped uncover a web of donor influence, media manipulation, and constituent deception that challenges the integrity of an Oregon Senator.

The case centers on Smith's unreported 92 three-minute segments on KWRO radio in January 2024, valued at $18 per minute, which he received after pressuring the station owner to cancel Rob Taylor's show. Taylor was a local radio show host who had been on the air for over five years. However, the story behind these broadcasts reveals a calculated quid pro quo arrangement in which a station owner was coerced into silencing a critic. Then the politician applying the pressure was rewarded with unchallenged airtime to spin his story.

The Silencing of Rob Taylor

The controversy began when Smith appeared on "The Rob Taylor Report" radio show on KWRO, owned by Bi Coastal Media. During the interview, Taylor confronted Smith about his campaign contributors and his support for offshore wind turbine projects. Smith's response was not to address the questions honestly but to demand the show's removal from the air.

Smith did not like an interview he was part of on the radio show. Smith demanded that the owner of the radio company, Mike Wilson, remove the show from the air because he didn't like the questions being asked by the host, Rob Taylor.

Wilson capitulated to the political pressure, canceling Taylor's contract and removing the show from the airwaves. Then, after silencing a prominent critic of Smith's, Wilson provided Smith with 92 three-minute segments worth $4,968 to present his version of events without challenge or rebuttal.

The $150,000 Question

The questions that prompted Smith's retaliation centered on a wealthy California Democrat who contributed $150,000 to the rural Republican senator's political action committee. The donor contributed $125,000 in annual increments of $25,000 over 7 years, while his deceased wife had previously contributed $25,000. The donor in question made his money managing hedge funds in China, which was an interesting aspect to the story, because Smith is on the Oregon Chinese Council. Smith's inability to explain why such a substantial sum would flow from a California Democrat to a safe Republican seat in rural Oregon raised immediate red flags. The donation becomes even more suspicious when viewed in light of Smith's voting record on environmental legislation.

In 2021, Smith voted for Oregon House Bill 3375, which established a roadmap for offshore wind energy development and set a goal of 3 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030. Despite this vote, Smith repeatedly told his constituents he opposed offshore wind development.

Video Evidence Contradicts Public Statemen

Video evidence from the Oregon Legislature shows Smith giving testimony in favor of the offshore wind bill and supporting the use of wind turbines. When confronted with this contradiction during the Taylor interview, Smith claimed the bill "slowed down the process" rather than acknowledging it created the framework for massive wind energy development off Oregon's coast.

"Smith said the bill slowed down the process, but instead, it created a roadmap and set a goal of 3 GW of offshore wind energy by 2030," sources confirmed. "It was a blatant lie." The deception runs deeper when examining Smith's funding sources. Records show Smith has accepted money from PACs funded by green energy companies involved in solar and wind energy projects.

Significantly, the last remaining company bidding on offshore wind leases in Coos and Curry Counties was among the green energy companies that contributed to a PAC that has contributed money to Smith's PAC.

Coordinated Intimidation Campaign

Following the confrontational interview, Smith's wealthy donor threatened to take legal action against the radio station if Taylor's show were to remain on the air. The donor objected to having his name and that of his deceased wife mentioned in connection with their political contributions, despite these being public records.

This coordinated pressure campaign succeeded in silencing Taylor, who was deplatformed and unable to respond. The timeline reveals the calculated nature of this arrangement: Smith appeared on Taylor's weekly radio show for a 30-minute interview, didn't like the tough questions, pressured Wilson to cancel Taylor's show, and then received 92 three-minute segments to spin his story without Taylor being able to respond.

The station's owner canceled the host's contract and gave Smith an inordinate amount of time to spin the story to the public on the same station where the show was broadcast. The story was mostly forgotten until the Secretary of State found the Senator guilty of violating campaign finance law.

Smith’s Lousy Voting Record

Smith's actions reveal a pattern inconsistent with conservative principles. He maintains low voting scores with organizations like CPAC and the Republican Liberty Caucus of Oregon, while simultaneously accepting funding from green energy interests that directly benefit from his legislative votes. In the recent legislative session, Smith voted for a controversial bill, SB 147, concerning the Elliott State Forest. It was the final nail in the coffin for education ever receiving funding from timber harvests, and turns the forest into a research forest where the state will sell carbon credits for sequestration efforts.

Smith voted for the Fire Mapping Bill, SB 762, in the 2021 Regular Session, only to have to vote to repeal it in the 2025 Session because it would have put financial burdens on the property owners due to higher insurance rates and new regulations. His voting record is marked by bills that include funding for DEI. Smith even voted for the Menstrual Dignity Act, which directed schools to put tampons in the boys’ bathrooms.

There is a Grassroots Response Emerging

Smith faced the most contentious primary challenge in any state Senate district due to his questionable character. Smith spent $250,000 against his primary opponent, who spent only $25,000. It may have illustrated the influence of wealthy donor networks in insulating politicians from accountability, but it ultimately cost him and his donors a lot of money.

Despite the suppression efforts, Taylor's show survived by moving to podcasting, where it continues to expose political corruption. Citizens in Smith's district are beginning to organize within the local Republican Party structure to demand accountability.

People are getting involved in the local chapter of the Republican Party in Smith’s district. People are working to change the leadership through participation in the local party's central committee. Hopefully, they will establish standards for their candidates, as they do not want to be fooled again.

The Secretary of State's investigation and the potential for a subsequent fine may provide vindication for Taylor's original reporting, proving for independent journalism can ultimately prevail against political intimidation.


--Staff Reports

Post Date: 2025-08-10 10:06:35

Last Update: 2025-08-10 16:19:46